tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12660458.post113579120605679436..comments2023-09-01T10:33:09.297-04:00Comments on Pulmonary Roundtable: Abnormal CT scan - part IIUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12660458.post-1135888052153072382005-12-29T15:27:00.000-05:002005-12-29T15:27:00.000-05:003 months is a consensus.3 months is a consensus.Mike Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12177750268091750583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12660458.post-1135800748478720762005-12-28T15:12:00.000-05:002005-12-28T15:12:00.000-05:00I agree--there is some relative reassurance that e...I agree--there is some relative reassurance that even though malignancy is not ruled out, it is not a "highly metabolic lesion" and more likely to be slow-growing if malignant. I think short term follow-up is warrented. <BR/><BR/>And, I hope everyone has a safe and happy New Year!Jeff Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01209432708535732499noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12660458.post-1135794812391226222005-12-28T13:33:00.000-05:002005-12-28T13:33:00.000-05:00Suprising that it was without uptake given the way...Suprising that it was without uptake given the way it looked on that 1st CT. Given these results, a f/u CT in 3 months to assess for change would be reasonable.Jenningshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04930453447603683057noreply@blogger.com